The Estate of Demetrius Stanley v. City of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20245:22-cv-03000California3,676 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 THE ESTATE OF DEMETRIUS Case No. 22-cv-03000-VKD STANLEY, et al., 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE 10 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 50, 51 11 CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., 12 Defendants.

13 14 The Court held a pretrial conference in this matter on January 17, 2024. Dkt. No. 56. This 15 order resolves the parties’ motions in limine. Dkt. Nos. 50, 51. The Court will issue separate 16 orders regarding the parties’ proposed jury instructions (Dkt. No. 55-8) and other matters 17 discussed during the pretrial conference. 18 I. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1 19 Plaintiffs move to exclude matters that officers were unaware of at the time of the 20 shooting. Specifically, they move to exclude: (1) any reports and testimony by San Jose 21 Detective Amanda Estantino regarding a March 2021 armed robbery, which was the basis for the 22 outstanding warrant for Mr. Stanley’s arrest and the May 31, 2021 reconnaissance by the San Jose 23 Police Department…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.