DOE 1 v. GitHub, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20244:22-cv-06823California6,142 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 J.DOE 1, et al., Case No. 22-cv-06823-JST Plaintiffs, 8

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS

10 GITHUB, INC., et al., Re: ECF Nos. 108, 110 Defendants. 11 12 13 Before the Court are motions to dismiss filed by Defendants GitHub, Inc., and Microsoft 14 Corporation (collectively “Defendant GitHub”), ECF No. 108; and Defendants OpenAI, Inc., 15 OpenAI, L.P., OpenAI OPCO, L.L.C., OpenAI GP, L.L.C., OpenAI Startup Fund GP I, L.L.C., 16 OpenAI Startup Fund I, L.P., and OpenAI Startup Fund Management, LLC (collectively 17 “Defendant OpenAI”), ECF No. 110.1 The Court will grant the motions in part and deny them in 18 part. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 Because the facts are well-known to the parties and the Court has summarized Plaintiffs’ 21 allegations in detail in its prior order, ECF No. 95, the Court will not elaborate them here. 22 Defendants previously filed motions to dismiss, which this Court granted in part and 23 denied in part. Id. On the question…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.