Johnson v. Alameda County Sheriff Department - Santa Rita Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20244:20-cv-08283California3,971 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

24 A. Defendants’ Evidence 25 In support of their motion for partial summary judgment, Defendants submit 1) video 26

27 1 Plaintiff’s third amended complaint refers to the ACSO officers as Doe #1, the arresting officer 1 evidence of ACSO’s arrest of Plaintiff on February 14, 2019 between 3:30 a.m. and 4:00 a.m. in 2 the area of International Boulevard and 73rd Avenue in Oakland (Docket No. 75-1 (Amy Lu 3 Decl., Oct. 5, 2023) ¶¶ 2-6, Exs. A (Lieutenant Michael Buckhout’s Body-Worn Camera (“BWC”) 4 footage between 3:25 a.m. and 4:03 a.m. (“Buckhout BWC”)), B (Sergeant Michael Bitle’s BWC 5 footage between 3:28 a.m. and 3:34 a.m. (“First Bitle BWC”)), C (Sergeant Michael Bitle’s BWC 6 footage between 3:52 a.m. and 3:58 a.m. (“Second Bitle BWC”)), D (Sergeant Victor Galindo’s 7 BWC footage between 3:26 a.m. and 4:02 a.m. (“Galindo BWC”)), and E (Deputy Michael Ella’s 8 BWC footage between 3:26 a.m. and 3:33 a.m. (“Ella BWC”)); 2) a copy of ACSO’s General 9 Order No. 8.17 regarding the use, purpose, maintenance, and storage of data captured on BWCs 10 (Id., Ex. E (“ACSO General Order No. 8.17”); 3) excerpts of Plaintiff’s deposition taken on June…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.