Skillz Platform Inc. v. AviaGames Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20245:21-cv-02436California2,215 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 SKILLZ PLATFORM INC., Case No. 21-cv-02436-BLF

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING SEALING

9 v. MOTIONS IN CONNECTION

ADDITIONAL MOTIONS IN LIMINE

10 AVIAGAMES INC., [Re: ECF No. 562, 581, 587] 11 Defendant.

12 13 Before the Court are the parties’ renewed motions to seal and statements in connection 14 with the briefing on their additional motions in limine. ECF Nos. 562, 581, 587. The Court has 15 considered the motions and statements, and its rulings are laid out below. 16 I. LEGAL STANDARD 17 “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records 18 and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of 19 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 20 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). Consequently, access to motions and their attachments that are 21 “more than tangentially related to the merits of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.