Shelley

Shelley v. Leisure Hotel Group, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20244:23-cv-02007California5,975 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARVIN RAY SHELLEY, Case No. 23-cv-02007-DMR

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

9 v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

10 LEISURE HOTEL GROUP, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 21 11 Defendant.

12 Defendant Leisure Hotel Group, LLC (“Leisure Hotel Group”) moves pursuant to Federal 13 Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiff Marvin Ray Shelley’s first 14 amended complaint. [Docket No. 21 (“Mot.”).] Shelley opposed, and Leisure Hotel Group 15 replied. [Docket Nos. 24 (“Opp’n”), 26 (“Reply”).] This matter is suitable for resolution without 16 a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, Leisure Hotel Group’s motion is granted 17 in part and denied in part. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Shelley filed a complaint against Leisure Hotel Group on April 25, 2023. On August 10, 20 2023, the court held a hearing on Leisure Hotel Group’s motion to dismiss and granted the motion 21 in part. [Docket No. 16 (8/10/2023 Minute Order).] …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.