KJ-Park, LLC v. Match Group, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20245:23-cv-02346California2,214 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 KJ-PARK, LLC, Case No. 23-cv-02346-VKD

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DECEMBER 27, 2023

10 v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE

PRIVILEGE CLAIMS

11 MATCH GROUP, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 55 Defendants. 12

13 14 Plaintiff KJ-Park, LLC (“KJ-Park”), defendants Match Group, LLC and Match Group, Inc. 15 (collectively, “Match Group”), and non-party Jones Lange LaSalle Americas, Inc. (“JLL”) ask the 16 Court to resolve a dispute concerning documents withheld from production by Match Group and 17 JLL based on Match Group’s assertions that the documents are protected from disclosure by the 18 attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. Dkt. No. 55. The Court finds 19 this dispute suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). 20 For the reasons explained below, the Court orders Match Group and JLL to serve a 21 privilege log that complies with Rule 26(b)(6(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by 22…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.