Day

Day v. GEICO Casualty Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20245:21-cv-02103California5,100 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 JESSICA DAY, Case No. 21-cv-02103-BLF

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

9 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

10 GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, et al., [Re: ECF No. 171] 11 Defendants.

12 13 Before the Court is Defendants GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, 14 and GEICO General Insurance Company’s (collectively “GEICO”) Motion for Summary 15 Judgment. ECF No. 171 (“Mot.”). Plaintiff Jessica Day opposes the motion. ECF No. 190 16 (“Opp.”). GEICO filed a reply in support of its motion. ECF No. 199 (“Reply”). The Court held 17 a hearing on the motion on December 14, 2023. ECF No. 209. 18 For the following reasons, the Court DENIES GEICO’s motion. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 On April 8, 2020, near the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, GEICO announced the 21 “GEICO Giveback,” a program that provided a 15% discount on new and renewed auto and 22 motorcycle insurance policies. ECF No. 172-6 at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.