Barnes
Barnes v. Carter
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, Case No. 22-cv-00882-WHO (PR)
Petitioner, 8
ORDER STAYING ACTION
v. 9
10 PATRICK COVELLO, Respondent. 11
12 13 Petitioner Antoine Deshawn Barnes’s motion to stay habeas proceedings so that he 14 can exhaust claims in state court is GRANTED. (Dkt. No. 14 at 1.) This federal habeas 15 action is STAYED under Rhines v. Webber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). Nothing further will 16 take place in this suit until the Court decides further action is appropriate, or until Barnes 17 meets the conditions for dissolving the stay. 18 After obtaining a decision from the state supreme court on his unexhausted claims, 19 Barnes must file in this Court a motion to dissolve the stay and to reopen federal habeas 20 proceedings. The motion must have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first 21 page. It must also contain an amended petition on this Court’s form. The amended 22 petition must include the caption and civil case number used in this order (22-00882 WHO 23 (PR)) and the words THIRD AMENDED PETITION…