Gregg

Gregg v. Bohemian Club

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20243:23-cv-02760California4,230 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANTHONY GREGG, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02760-AMO

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS

v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 34, 35 10 BOHEMIAN CLUB, et al., Defendants. 11

12 13 Before the Court are Motions to Dismiss from Defendants Pomella LLC (“Pomella”) and 14 Bohemian Club. The Motions are suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the 15 hearing set for January 25, 2024, is VACATED. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having read the parties’ 16 papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby 17 GRANTS both Motions to Dismiss. 18 BACKGROUND 19 This is a putative class action involving wage and hour claims. Plaintiffs bring this action 20 against Defendants Monastery Camp, Bohemian Club, and Pomella LLC, alleging they jointly 21 employed Plaintiffs as valets. To properly assess the motions to dismiss, the Court accepts as true 22 and draws from the allegations in the First Amended Complaint (ECF 5, “FAC”). See Manzarek 23 v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.