Broomfield

Mitchell v. Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20244:23-cv-06295California1,615 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CORREY MITCHELL, Case No. 23-cv-06295-JSW

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

9 v. AND OF SERVICE

10 RONALD BROOMFIELD, et al., Defendants. 11

12 INTRODUCTION 13 Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights case under 42 14 U.S.C. § 1983. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. For 15 the reasons discussed below, certain claims are dismissed, and the complaint is ordered served on 16 Defendants. 17 ANALYSIS 18 A. STANDARD OF REVIEW 19 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek 20 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 21 1915A(a). In its review the court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims 22 which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek 23 monetary relief from a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.