Woloszynska

Woloszynska v. Netflix, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20245:23-cv-00636California784 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 KATARZYNA WOLOSZYNSKA, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00636-BLF

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT

9 v. AND MINOR’S COMPROMISE

10 NETFLIX, INC., et al., [Re: ECF No. 62] 11 Defendants.

12 13 On February 13, 2023, Plaintiffs, including Maja Woloszyńska (“Maja”), a minor, filed 14 this action against Defendants Netflix Inc., et al. ECF No. 1, 25. On October 18, 2023, the parties 15 settled the case with Magistrate Judge DeMarchi. ECF No. 57. Per the Court’s Order (ECF No. 16 59), Plaintiffs filed for dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. ECF No. 61. On 17 December 20, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to notify the Court “whether Plaintiff Maja 18 Woloszyńska is subject to the minor’s compromise, or if she is exempt.” ECF No. 62. On 19 January 5, 2024, Plaintiffs responded that “because the settlement agreement was negotiated, and 20 approved by the Magistrate Judge, the Plaintiffs believe that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.