Unicorn Energy AG v. Tesla, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20245:21-cv-07476California786 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 UNICORN ENERGY GMBH, Case No. 21-cv-07476-BLF

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE

9 v. MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL;

DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE

10 TESLA INC., MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER

ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL

11 Defendant. SHOULD BE SEALED 12 [Re: ECF No. 316, 326, 327]

13 14 Before the Court are three administrative motions: 15 1. Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Tesla’s Motion to Strike Portions of Dr. 16 Marc Herniter’s Opening Expert Report. ECF No. 316. 17 2. Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. ECF No. 326. 18 3. Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be 19 Sealed. ECF No. 327. 20 For the reasons described below, the administrative motions are DENIED. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 On December 27, 2023, Tesla filed a Motion to Strike Portions of Dr. Marc…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.