In re Field Asset Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20243:13-cv-00057California2,820 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FRED BOWERMAN, et al., Case No. 3:13-cv-00057-WHO

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON WAITING TIME CLAIMS

9 v. IN PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

10 FIELD ASSET SERVICES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 651, 652 Defendants. 11

12 13 BACKGROUND 14 The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment or in the alternative summary 15 adjudication. I issued an order addressing most of the issues raised in those motions, which lays 16 out the background and facts of these cases. (“Prior Order”) [Dkt. No. 691]. This Order assumes 17 familiarity with those facts, which are incorporated here by reference. 18 Based on arguments raised by the parties at the hearing on these motions, I also ordered 19 supplemental briefing relating to the plaintiffs’ waiting time claims and the defendants’ arguments 20 about the “corporate vendor plaintiffs.” [Dkt. No. 686]. The parties filed simultaneous briefs 21 regarding the waiting time claims. Plaintiffs’ Supplemental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.