Clements

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 BRADFORD ARTHUR CLEMENTS, Case No. 5:22-cv-07512-EJD 9 Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER GRANTING

MOTION TO COMPEL

10 v. ARBITRATION AND DISMISS 11 T-MOBILE USA, INC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 37 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff, Branford Clements (“Clements”), filed this data breach action against Defendant, 14 T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al. (“T-Mobile”), alleging claims arising under various California 15 consumer protection and privacy statutes, common law torts, and the Stored Communications Act 16 (“SCA”). First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 35. Before the Court is T-Mobile’s unopposed 17 motion to compel arbitration and dismiss. Def.’s Mot. to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss 18 (“Mot.”), ECF No. 37. 19 Having carefully reviewed the relevant documents, the Court finds this matter suitable for 20 decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, 21 the Court GRANTS T-Mobile’s motion to…