Taylor

Taylor v. International Union of Painters and Allied Trades

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20243:23-cv-03491California992 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WILLIAM TAYLOR, Case No. 23-cv-03491-WHO

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING EX PARTE

9 v. APPLICATION TO FILE CLAIM

WITH PREJUDICE

10 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 12 11 Defendants.

12 13 I denied William Taylor’s Ex Parte Application for Leave of The Court to File Claim on 14 Good Cause Shown (29 U.S.C. § 501), which was directly related to his prior case (Taylor v. 15 IUPAT, et al, No. 21-cv-8712-WHO, U.S. Dist. Ct, N.D. Cal.) (“First Lawsuit”) against many of 16 the same defendants in whose favor I granted summary judgment, see First Lawsuit, Dkt. No. 113 17 (“Summary Judgment Order”); Application [Dkt. No. 1], because he lacked good cause to 18 commence litigation over what appeared to be a dormant internal proceeding. See Prior Order 19 [Dkt. No. 12]; see also 29 U.S.C. § 501(b). I told him that he could amend if the internal 20 proceeding actually resulted in some adjudication that Taylor believed would bolster his showing 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.