Rankins
Rankins v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TAMI RANKINS, Case No. 3:23-cv-05785-JSC
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION
9 v. TO DISMISS
10 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 5 Defendant. 11
12 13 Tami Rankins sued United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) in California state court, alleging 14 UPS discriminated against her because of her age and gender, intentionally inflicted emotional 15 distress through that discrimination, and breached her employment contract with the company, in 16 violation of California laws. (Dkt. No. 1-1 ¶ 1.)1 UPS then removed this action to federal court. 17 (Dkt. No. 1.) Now pending before the Court is UPS’s motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 5.) Having 18 carefully considered the briefing, the Court concludes oral argument is not required, see N.D. Cal. 19 Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS Defendant’s motion with leave to amend. 20 BACKGROUND 21 I. COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS 22 Rankins was hired by UPS on March 15, 1989. (Dkt. No. 1-1 ¶ 23.) …