Garcia

Garcia v. McVay

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20243:22-cv-02612California244 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MANUEL R GARCIA, Case No. 22-cv-02612-JD 8 Petitioner,

ORDER RE DISMISSAL

9 v. 10 MATTHEW MCVAY, ll Respondent. 12

13 Manuel Garcia, a pro se state prisoner, filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 14 || Respondent filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the sole claim in the petition was 15 || unexhausted. The Court granted the motion but provided Garcia twenty-eight days to file a 16 || motion for a stay if he chose to exhaust the claim. The Court granted Garcia an extension, but he 3 17 || has not filed a motion for a stay. 18 The case is dismissed as unexhausted, and the Clerk is requested to close it. A certificate 19 || of appealability (“COA”) will not issue because this is not a case in which “jurists of reason would 20 || find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and 21 || that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.