Albert D. Seeno Construction Co., Inc. v. AIG Specialty Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20244:21-cv-02152California5,277 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALBERT D. SEENO CONSTRUCTION Case No. 21-cv-02152-JST CO., INC., et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 9 MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY v. JUDGMENT AND GRANTING 10 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

AIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

11 COMPANY, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 144, 149 12 Defendants. 13 14 Before the Court are motions for summary judgment brought by Plaintiffs Albert D. Seeno 15 Construction Co., Inc. and related entities (collectively, “Seeno”), ECF No. 144, and Defendants 16 AIG Specialty Insurance Company (“ASIC”) and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania 17 (“ICSOP”), ECF No. 149. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant ASIC and 18 ICSOP’s motion and deny Seeno’s motion. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 Seeno is a group of residential development and construction companies that build homes 21 in Northern California. In order to manage its construction defect liability…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.