Yu

Yu v. Ndoh

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20243:20-cv-06970California9,223 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DANIEL YU, Case No. 3:20-cv-06970-JD

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE PETITION FOR HABEAS

9 v. CORPUS

10 ROSEMARY NDOH, et al., Defendants. 11

12 Petitioner Daniel Yu, a California state prisoner, alleges several claims for habeas relief 13 under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt No. 16. The Court directed respondent to show cause why the writ 14 should not be granted. Dkt. No. 18. Respondent filed an answer to the habeas petition, Dkt. No. 15 25, and Yu filed a traverse, Dkt. No. 51. The petition is denied. 16 BACKGROUND 17 The California Court of Appeal provided a detail account of the material facts and trial 18 proceedings. See People v. Yu, No. H044305, 2019 WL 1577745, at *1 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 12, 19 2019). As stated in pertinent part: 20 Jane Doe is the oldest of four children born to Chinese immigrants. Her best friend was defendant's daughter, A., who had emigrated 21 with her parents from China. The families…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.