Shelton

Shelton v. Comerica Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20243:23-cv-02815California1,445 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9

10 JOAN SHELTON, 11 Plaintiff, No. C 23-02815 WHA

12 v.

13 COMERICA BANK, et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

14 Defendants.

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

15 16 INTRODUCTION 17 In this action alleging failure to prevent and investigate fraud and identity theft in 18 violation of the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, California Business and Professional Code 19 Section 17200, and California Civil Code Section 1798.2, plaintiff seeks leave to file a second 20 amended complaint. For the reasons below, plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. 21 STATEMENT 22 Plaintiff filed suit in state court against defendants Comerica Bank and Conduent 23 Business Services, LLC, alleging that they failed to properly investigate and respond to 24 identity theft and fraud relating to her Direct Express account, through which she accessed her 25 disability benefits provided by the Social Security Administration. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.