Cooper
Cooper v. City and County of San Francisco
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ELIJAH COOPER, Case No. 5:23-cv-03969 EJD (PR)
7 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE
TO AMEND
8 v.
9 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 13 1983 against the City and County of San Francisco and Sheriff Deputy Khorge. Dkt. No. 6 at 2. 14 Then over a month later, Plaintiff then filed a document which was construed as an amended 15 complaint. Dkt. No. 10. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was granted. 16 Dkt. No. 11. This matter was reassigned to the undersigned on December 22, 2023. Dkt. No. 15. 17 18 DISCUSSION 19 A. Standard of Review 20 A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks 21 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 22 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any…