Estillore
Estillore v. Capgemini America, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ROWENA ESTILLORE, Case No. 23-cv-05816-JD
9 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE ARBITRATION
v. 10
11 CAPGEMINI AMERICA, INC., Defendant. 12
13 14 Pro se plaintiff Rowena Estillore has filed a complaint against her former employer, 15 defendant Capgemini America, Inc. Dkt. No. 1-1. Capgemini asks to send the case to arbitration 16 pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and a binding arbitration clause in Estillore’s 17 employment agreement. Dkt. No. 11. Estillore did not file an opposition, which was due by 18 January 5, 2024 (see Civ. L. R. 7-3(a)), or otherwise communicate with the Court. The motion is 19 suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), and arbitration is 20 granted. 21 The Court has detailed the standards governing a motion to compel arbitration under the 22 FAA in several prior orders, which are incorporated here. See Louis v. Healthsource Glob. 23 Staffing, Inc., No. 22-cv-02436-JD, 2022 WL 4960666 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2022); Williams v. Eaze 24 …