Johnson v. Veritas Investment Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20243:23-cv-05190California965 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAMES ELLIS JOHNSON, Case No. 23-cv-05190-AMO

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 8 10 VERITAS INVESTMENT INC, et al., Defendants. 11

12 13 Defendants Veritas Investment Inc, GreenTree Property Management, Inc. (“GreenTree”), 14 Jessica Castorena, and Ehsan Panah move to dismiss the complaint filed by pro se Plaintiff James 15 Ellis Johnson. Johnson opposes dismissal. ECF 13. Having considered all the papers filed by the 16 parties, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss. 17 BACKGROUND 18 The Complaint makes the following allegations, which the Court accepts as true for 19 purposes of considering this facial challenge to subject matter jurisdiction. Wolfe v. Strankman, 20 392 F.3d 358, 362 (9th Cir. 2004). 21 This case arises from a series of attacks on Johnson in his San Francisco apartment. 22 Defendants caused Johnson physical and emotional injury by: (1) illegally entering his apartment; 23 (2) removing sound proofing from his apartment;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.