Hendrik Block v. 7-Eleven, Inc
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 21-cv-00048-BLF
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
9 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT; GRANTING IN PART
10 7-ELEVEN, INC, et al., AND DENYING IN PART
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
11 Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 12 [Re: ECF Nos. 49, 50]
13 14 Plaintiff Hendrik Block asserts claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities 15 Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq. (“ADA”), the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. 16 Civ. Code §§ 51, et seq. (“Unruh Act”), and California Health and Safety Code § 19955. ECF No. 17 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, statutory damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. Id. 18 Before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. Defendants 7- 19 Eleven, Inc., Ha To dba 7-Eleven #29943, and Southwest Expressway Investors, Ltd., a California 20 Limited Partnership…