Hendrik Block v. 7-Eleven, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20245:21-cv-00048California2,674 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 21-cv-00048-BLF

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

9 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; GRANTING IN PART

10 7-ELEVEN, INC, et al., AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

11 Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 12 [Re: ECF Nos. 49, 50]

13 14 Plaintiff Hendrik Block asserts claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities 15 Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq. (“ADA”), the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. 16 Civ. Code §§ 51, et seq. (“Unruh Act”), and California Health and Safety Code § 19955. ECF No. 17 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, statutory damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. Id. 18 Before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. Defendants 7- 19 Eleven, Inc., Ha To dba 7-Eleven #29943, and Southwest Expressway Investors, Ltd., a California 20 Limited Partnership…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.