In Re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 Case No. 22-cv-03580-WHO

6

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

7 IN RE META HEALTHCARE PIXEL AND STRIKE 8 LITIGATION Re: Dkt. Nos. 387, 388 9

10

11 In my September 7, 2023 Order, I denied defendant Meta Platform, Inc.’s motion to 12 dismiss certain claims, but granted it with leave to amend plaintiffs’ claims for invasion of 13 privacy/intrusion on seclusion, California’s Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act 14 (“CDAFA”), negligence per se, trespass, larceny, Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), and 15 California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”). Doe v. Meta Platforms, Inc., No. 22-CV- 16 03580-WHO, 2023 WL 5837443, at *17 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 7, 2023). In their First Amended 17 Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“FAC,” Dkt. No. 334-3) plaintiffs did not reallege their 18 negligence per se, larceny, or UCL claims and amended and realleged their privacy/intrusion of 19 seclusion, CDAFA, trespass and CLRA claims. Meta moves again to dismiss. Plaintiffs 20 voluntarily…