Choudhuri

Choudhuri v. Specialized Loan Servicing

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20244:22-cv-06993California588 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KABITA CHOUDHURI, Case No. 22-cv-06993-JST

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

9 v. ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT;

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:

10 SPECIALISED LOAN SERVICING, et al., SERVICE 11 Defendants. Re: ECF No. 54

12 13 The second amended complaint in this case was filed on November 7, 2023. As of the date 14 of this order, the docket reflects no evidence that the summons and complaint have been served on 15 Defendant Bosco Credit LLC. Plaintiff has submitted the declaration of Leila Sen, averring that 16 she served the complaint on Bosco by mail and email to Bosco at an address in Jersey City, New 17 Jersey. ECF No. 52-2. Because Plaintiff has not also submitted a written acknowledgement from 18 Bosco, such service was not effective:

19 Although service of a summons and complaint by mail is effective under California law and is thus effective in this judicial district 20 pursuant to Federal Rule 4(e), such service is only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.