Boobuli's LLC v. State Farm Fire And Casualty Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20243:20-cv-07074California8,809 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BOOBULI'S LLC, Case No. 20-cv-07074-WHO

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 This action is based on plaintiff Boobuli’s LLC (“Boobuli’s”) allegation that despite an unavoidable decrease in its business operations due to the COVID pandemic in 2020 - 2021, its insurer, defendant State Farm General Insurance Company (“State Farm”), failed to properly adjust the premiums for its business risk insurance plans. Boobuli’s brings equitable claims on behalf of similarly situated California businessowners for violations of the Unfair Competition Law, the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment. Defendant State Farm moves for summary judgment, or in the alternative, partial summary judgment, because it did adjust rates, it suffered significant underwriting losses on its Businessowners policies during the time period…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.