Boobuli's LLC v. State Farm Fire And Casualty Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20243:20-cv-07074California8,809 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BOOBULI'S LLC, Case No. 20-cv-07074-WHO

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 9 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

10 STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 13 This action is based on plaintiff Boobuli’s LLC (“Boobuli’s”) allegation that despite an 14 unavoidable decrease in its business operations due to the COVID pandemic in 2020 - 2021, its 15 insurer, defendant State Farm General Insurance Company (“State Farm”), failed to properly 16 adjust the premiums for its business risk insurance plans.1 Boobuli’s brings equitable claims on 17 behalf of similarly situated California businessowners for violations of the Unfair Competition 18 Law, the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment. Defendant State Farm 19 moves for summary judgment, or in the alternative, partial summary judgment, because it did 20 adjust rates, it suffered significant underwriting losses on its Businessowners policies during the 21 time period…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.