Gjovik

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ASHLEY M GJOVIK, Case No. 23-cv-04597-EMC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

9 v. MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE;

AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S

10 APPLE INC., SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

11 Defendant. Docket Nos. 35, 37 12

13 14 15 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for judicial notice. Having 16 considered the parties’ papers, the Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral 17 argument. The motion for judicial notice is hereby DENIED without prejudice as moot. 18 At the time Plaintiff submitted her request for judicial notice, there was a pending motion 19 to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”). Plaintiff had filed an opposition to the 20 motion but had also filed a second amended complaint (“SAC”). When Plaintiff filed her request 21 for judicial notice, she stated that she was submitting it both (1) in support of her opposition to 22 Defendant’s motion to dismiss the FAC and (2)…