Kissner

Kissner v. Loma Prieta Joint Union School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20243:22-cv-00949California9,243 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND1

1 A. Relevant Factual History 2 On February 12, 2021, Fraser, then superintendent, issued Kissner a Notice of 3 Proposed Intent to Dismiss. Kissner Depo. Ex. 13 (dkt. 115-10). The Notice attached a 4 nineteen-page “Statement of Charges,” which charged Kissner with Immoral Conduct, 5 Unprofessional Conduct, Unsatisfactory Performance, Evident Unfitness for Service, and 6 “Persistent violation of or refusal to obey the school laws of the state or reasonable 7 regulations prescribed for the government of the public schools by the state board or by the 8 governing board of the school district employing him or her,” in violation of the Education 9 Code. Id. at 4. The Statement of Charges included the allegation that Kissner engaged in 10 “Potential grooming behavior, such as: singling out a minor and being alone with a minor; 11 offering alcohol; asking about sex/sexual encounters; and posting images of youth partially 12 unclothed on the internet.” Id. at 7. Attached to the Statement of Charges was a 200-plus- 13 page “Confidential Investigation Report” prepared by an attorney. Id. at 48–255. 14 On March 22, 2021, counsel for Kissner wrote to the District,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.