Rodrigues

Rodrigues v. General Motors LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20243:23-cv-04488California1,145 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9

10 ANNETTE RODRIGUES and CHARLES

SMITH,

11 No. C 23-04488 WHA Plaintiffs, 12

v.

13 ORDER DENYING LEAVE GENERAL MOTORS LLC, a limited TO AMEND 14 liability company; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Last month, an order denied a motion to remand and granted a motion to dismiss 19 plaintiffs Annette Rodrigues and Charles Smith’s fraud claims (Dkt. No. 35). That order also 20 dismissed their remaining claims, which were brought under the Song-Beverly Act and simply 21 restated elements without alleging specific facts. Plaintiffs were allowed to seek leave to file 22 an amended complaint by motion and encouraged to plead their best case. Upon review of 23 plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint and proposed amended complaint, 24 that motion is DENIED.1 25 26 1 Plaintiffs also separately filed an “Opposition to General Motors LLC’s Motion to Dismiss” 27 (Dkt. No. 38). Seeing that there is no pending motion to dismiss, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.