Moore

Moore v. GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20244:20-cv-09077California7,753 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5 LISA M. MOORE individually and on Case No: 4:20-cv-09077-JSW 6 behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

7

CERTIFY CLASS AND GRANTING

Plaintiff, 8 v. AND DENYING MOTIONS TO

EXCLUDE

9

GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER

Re: Dkt. Nos. 63, 81, 82, 94 10 HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC and

PFIZER INC.,

11 Defendants. 12 13 Now before the Court for consideration are Plaintiff’s motion for class certification; 14 Plaintiff’s motions to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Steven Dentali; and Defendants’ 15 motions to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Michael Dennis, Mr. Colin B. Weir, and Dr. Anton 16 Toutov. The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in 17 this case, and the Court finds the motions suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. 18 Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons set forth below, the Court HEREBY GRANTS IN PART AND 19 DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s class certification motion insofar as the motion to certify under 20 Rule 23(b)(2) is GRANTED, while the motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.