Broadcom Corporation v. Netflix, Inc.

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 BROADCOM CORPORATION, et al., Case No. 20-cv-04677-JD 6 Plaintiffs, , y. THIRD ORDER RE SEALING

8 NETFLIX INC, 9 Defendant. 10 This order resolves a set of sealing motions related to Broadcom’s Motion to Strike 11 Portions of the Supplemental Opening Expert Report of Samrat Bhattacharjee, Dkt. No. 381, 12 || which was terminated without prejudice pursuant to Dkt. Nos. 425 & 437. See Dkt. Nos. 379, 5 13 || 391, 392, 393, & 394. Netflix requested sealing because the report references materials that were 14 || designated confidential by non-parties VMware, F5 Networks, Microsoft, and Oracle. 3 15 VMware and Oracle filed statements in support of sealing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79- a 16 || which presented good cause for sealing portions of the report that reference their 3 17 || confidential source code. See Dkt. Nos. 400 & 398. F5 Networks and Microsoft did not file 18 || responses, which ordinarily would mean the…