Rocha

Rocha v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20243:23-cv-00542California3,169 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JESSICA ROCHA, Case No. 23-cv-00542-AMO

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

9 v. DISMISS AND COMPEL

ARBITRATION

10 URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendant. 11

12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Urban Outfitters, Inc.’s motion to dismiss and compel 14 arbitration. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having 15 read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, 16 the Court hereby DENIES the motion for the following reasons. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 On February 6, 2023, Plaintiff Jessica Rocha filed a putative class action against Defendant 19 Urban Outfitters, Inc. (“Urban Outfitters”), alleging one count of violating the California Invasion 20 of Privacy Act (“CIPA”), California Penal Code § 631. ECF 1 (“Compl.”). In late 2022, Rocha 21 visited the Urban Outfitters website. Compl. ¶ 27.1 She submitted messages using the chat 22 function on the website, which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.