Misch

Misch v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20244:22-cv-05278California1,244 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAVID MISCH, Case No. 22-cv-05278-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND

9 v. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

AMENDED COMPLAINT; GRANTING

10 ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR OFFICE, et al., EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 11 DISPOSITIVE MOTION AND FOR Defendants. LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 46, 48 13 14 Plaintiff, an inmate housed at Santa Rita County Jail, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 15 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Now pending before the Court are (1) Plaintiff’s request for clarification of 16 Dkt. No 34, clarification on dismissal of his appeal, and an order allowing Plaintiff to “file an 17 amended complaint as the court instructed him to do earlier on,” Dkt. No. 46, and (2) Defendants’ 18 request for an extension of time to file their dispositive motion and for leave to file an amended 19 answer, Dkt. No. 48. 20 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.