Ramirez
Ramirez v. Bank of America, N.A.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 ANTHONY RAMIREZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-00859-YGR (RMI)
9 Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DUSPUTES
10 v. Re: Dkt. No. 77 11 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 12 Defendant.
13 14 Currently pending before the court is a jointly-filed discovery dispute letter brief through 15 which Plaintiffs seek to compel the production of a variety of documents and information. See Ltr. 16 Br. (dkt. 77) at 1-2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), 17 the court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. For the reasons stated 18 below, Plaintiff’s requests are denied. 19 BACKGROUND 20 In this putative class action case, Plaintiffs (three individuals, on behalf of themselves and 21 other similarly situated) allege that in the Spring of 2020, at the outset of the COVID-19 22 pandemic, Defendant (Bank of America, hereafter, the “Bank”) “promised a pandemic-long relief 23 program…