Ramirez

Ramirez v. Bank of America, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20244:22-cv-00859California3,106 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 ANTHONY RAMIREZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-00859-YGR (RMI)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DUSPUTES

v. Re: Dkt. No. 77 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant.

13 Currently pending before the court is a jointly-filed discovery dispute letter brief through which Plaintiffs seek to compel the production of a variety of documents and information. See Ltr. Br. (dkt. 77) at 1-2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s requests are denied. BACKGROUND In this putative class action case, Plaintiffs (three individuals, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated) allege that in the Spring of 2020, at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Defendant (Bank of America, hereafter, the “Bank”) “promised a pandemic-long relief program…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.