Estavillo

Estavillo v. Cortese

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20245:23-cv-04032California1,454 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 ERIK ESTAVILLO, Case No. 23-cv-04032-VKD

9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 10 v. MOTION FOR RECUSAL OR

DISQUALIFICATION

11 DAVE CORTESE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 32 Defendants. 12

13 14 Plaintiff Erik Estavillo filed this action alleging that defendants violated Title III of the 15 Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) when they refused his request for a third parking 16 permit, beyond the two permits customarily allowed for residents at the County Club Villa 17 Apartments (“Apartments”). See Dkt. No. 1; see also Dkt. No. 21 at 3. His complaint requests, 18 among other things, “[a] declaration that Defendants’ policy of not allowing disabled residents to 19 park in designated handicapped parking spaces is in violation of the ADA” and an “[i]njunction 20 prohibiting Defendants from enforcing this policy.” Dkt. No. 1 at 9. 21 When the parties failed to comply Court’s “Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial 22…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.