Hollandberry
Stanley, Jr. v. Hollandberry
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RODRIC PETRECE STANLEY, JR., Case No. 22-cv-09129-JD
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS
v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 15 10 ELIZABETH HOLLANDBERRY, et al., Defendants. 11
12 13 Rodric Stanley, a detainee, filed a pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 14 Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.§ 12101 et seq. (“ADA”). 15 Defendants filed a motion to dismiss arguing that his claims are barred by res judicata, and the 16 allegations fail to state a claim for relief. Plaintiff filed an opposition and defendants filed a 17 reply.1 The complaint is dismissed. 18 Background 19 Amended Complaint 20 Plaintiff states that while in county jail in September and October 2022, defendant Dr. 21 Hollandberry denied him a cane, egg crates and a medical mattress despite an injured knee, back 22 and shoulder.2 Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 10 at 1-2, 7-11. Plaintiff slept on a thin mattress 23 and walked long distances without a cane. Id. at 1-3. Defendant also declined to…