Wynne

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6

ELIZABETH P WYNNE,

7 Case No. 23-cv-02365-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE: MOTION TO SEAL 9 PATRICIA ARTEAGA, Re: Dkt. No. 27 10 Defendant. 11

12 Plaintiff filed an “Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Material Should be Sealed” 13 in connection with her Motion for Summary Judgment.1 [Docket No. 27 (“Mot. to Seal”).] For 14 the following reasons, the motion is denied. 15 Plaintiff’s motion is confusing. Plaintiff appears to move to seal several documents in 16 their entirety: 1) Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, 2) the Declaration of Elizabeth P. 17 Wynne, including Exhibit A, 3) Exhibits 1-6 attached to the Declaration of George R. Nemiroff, 18 and 4) a proposed order filed in connection with Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Mot. 19 to Seal at 2. However, with the exception of Wynne’s declaration and attachments thereto, 20 redacted versions of these documents were publicly filed on December 1, 2023. [See Docket Nos. 21 26, 26-1, 26-3.] …