Lemke-Vega
Lemke-Vega v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHEYENNE LEMKE-VEGA, Case No. 23-cv-01408-DMR
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
9 v. AND/OR STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
10 MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 37 11 Defendant.
12 In this lemon law case, Plaintiff Cheyenne Lemke-Vega alleges violations of state and 13 federal law related to her July 2022 purchase of an allegedly defective 2019 Mercedes-Benz. 14 Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”) now moves pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil 15 Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(f) to dismiss and/or strike portions of the second amended complaint. 16 [Docket No. 37.] This matter is suitable for determination without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7- 17 1(b). For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss is granted. The motion to strike is denied 18 as moot. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 The second amended complaint (“SAC”) contains the following allegations.1 On July 18, 21 2022, Lemke-Vega purchased a 2019 Mercedes-Benz A220 (“the…