Ward

Ward v. Koenig

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20244:21-cv-09741California1,565 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TREVILLION WARD, Case No. 21-cv-09741-JST

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING NUNC PRO TUNC

9 v. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR

DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO

10 CRAIG KOENIG, DISCOVERY REQUEST; DENYING

REQUEST TO MODIFY SCHEDULING

11 Defendant. ORDER; DENYING PLAINITFF’S

REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF

12 COUNSEL AND TO AMEND THE

COMPLAINT

13 Re: ECF Nos. 31, 33, 34 14 15 Plaintiff, an inmate at Valley State Prison, has filed this pro se action pursuant to 16 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendant Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”) warden Koenig 17 authorized a July 20, 2020 raid at CTF that targeted African American inmates and did not require 18 correctional officers to use personal protective equipment, all with the intent to spread COVID to 19 African American inmates, in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on deliberate 20 indifference to inmate safety and to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.