Coleman
Coleman v. Hat World, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TAKORI JULIANA COLEMAN, on behalf Case No. 3:23-cv-03437-JD of herself and others similarly situated, 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE REMAND 9 v. 10 HAT WORLD, INC.; and DOES 1 to 100, 11 inclusive Defendants. 12
13 Plaintiff Takori Juliana Coleman, on behalf of herself and a putative class of California 14 employees, sued defendant Hat World, Inc. (Hat World) and unnamed Doe defendants for wage 15 and hour violations under the California Labor Code and the Business and Professions Code 16 Section 17200. Dkt. No. 1-2. Coleman originally sued in the Superior Court for Alameda County, 17 and Hat World removed the action to this Court on traditional diversity grounds. Dkt. No. 1 at 3- 18 10 (citing 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a)(1), 1441(a)). To be clear, removal was not made under the Class 19 Action Fairness Act. Coleman asks for a remand to the Superior Court. Dkt. No. 11. The case is 20 remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). 21 The only dispute with respect to diversity jurisdiction is whether the…