Spalinger

Spalinger v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20245:22-cv-04193California5,592 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 GLORIA SPALINGER, Case No. 5:22-cv-04193-EJD

9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGEMENT;

10 v. DENYING CROSS-MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

11 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, et al., 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 33, 39 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff, Gloria Spalinger (“Spalinger”), brought this action against Defendant, State Farm 14 General Insurance Company (“State Farm”) (collectively, “Parties”), alleging that State Farm’s 15 denial of Spalinger’s insurance claim gives rise to claims for declaratory relief, breach of contract, 16 breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, and violation of California’s Unfair Competition 17 Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq. Compl., ECF No. 1. Before the Court 18 are Spalinger’s motion for partial summary judgment as to the first cause of action for declaratory 19 relief, as well as State Farm’s cross-motion for summary judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.