Ahern

Clark v. Ahern

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20243:22-cv-06171California586 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LOUREECE STONE CLARK, et al., Case No. 22-cv-06171-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

GREGORY J. AHERN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 10 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding without representation by an attorney, filed this civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was dismissed as frivolous. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has filed “grounds” for reconsideration under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which the Court construes as a motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b). (ECF No. 10.) Rule 60(b) provides for reconsideration where one or more of the following is shown: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial; (3) fraud by the adverse party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied; (6) any other reason justifying …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.