Langham

Langham v. City of Union City

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20244:23-cv-01753California1,587 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MALIK LANGHAM, Case No. 23-cv-01753-JSW

10 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

11 v. DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO

12 CITY OF UNION CITY, et al., AMEND Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 26 13

14 15 Now before the Court is the motion to dismiss the seocond amended complaint filed by 16 Defendant City of Union City, Justin Noyd, Matthew Mangan, Kyle Scarbrough, Brian Ross, and 17 Brian Baumgartner (collectively “Defendants”). Defendants move to dismiss pursuant to Federal 18 Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on the grounds that the amended complaint fails to state a claim 19 upon which relief can be granted. Having considered the parties’ papers and authority, the Court 20 GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss, once more with leave to amend. 21 BACKGROUND 22 This case arises from an alleged search and seizure of Plaintiff’s vehicle after a traffic stop 23 with Union City police on October 30, 2022. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.