Zinnerman

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHARLES ZINNERMAN, et al., Case No. 24-cv-00141-TSH

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

9 v.

10 CLENTON TAXDHAL, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 13 Plaintiffs Charles Zinnerman and Denise Zinnerman have filed a complaint (ECF No. 1), 14 but it is unclear if Denise is intended as a named plaintiff. Although she is listed in the caption, 15 Denise is not listed in the body of the complaint, the description of the claims is in the first person 16 singular, and she didn’t sign the complaint. Charles is also the only named plaintiff that filed an 17 application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). As such, on January 9 the Court directed 18 Plaintiffs to clarify the status of their filings. ECF No. 4. If Denise sought to be a plaintiff, the 19 Court directed her to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402.00 filing fee 20 by January 31, 2024. Alternatively, if Charles intends to be the only named plaintiff, the Court 21 directed him to file an amended complaint by the…