Wise

Wise v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20244:23-cv-00163California447 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

JD. yEldanw Lar.d S Kchearlfefeyr ((117553669152)) 2 Kerley Schaffer LLP 1939 Harrison Street, #900 3 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 379-5801 4 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 5

6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 E VERRICK WISE an individual, NOEL Case No. 4:23-cv-00163-HSG RUSSELL, an individual, 11 ORDER (AS MODIFIED) GRANTING Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE 12 MOTION v. 13

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE

14 COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, and Dkt. No. 48 DOES 1 through 10, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On January 9, 2024, Plaintiffs E Verrick Wise and Noel Russell (“Plaintiffs”) filed an 19 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed, 20 accompanied by the supporting declaration of Christopher Carlin. Dkt. No. 48. The 21 administrative motion moves to seal Exhibit R and Exhibit X to Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial 22 Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 47 – two internal State Farm training and resource documents that 23 together total ten pages in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.