Moore
Moore v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 KEVIN MOORE, et al., Case No. 23-cv-05011-BLF
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER APPOINTING INTERIM
9 v. CLASS COUNSEL
10 AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., [Re: ECF No. 24] et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to appoint Capstone Law APC (“Capstone”) and 14 Berger Montague PC (“Berger”) as interim class counsel in this dispute concerning a defect 15 affecting certain Honda vehicles. See ECF No. 24 (“Mot.”). Defendants have filed a statement 16 that they do not oppose the relief requested in the motion. See ECF No. 25. For the following 17 reasons, the Court GRANTS this unopposed motion. 18 “Pursuant to Rule 23(g)(3), the court may designate interim counsel to act on behalf of a 19 putative class before determining whether to certify a class.” In re Seagate Tech. LLC Litig., No. 20 16-CV-00523-RMW, 2016 WL 3401989, at *2 (N.D. Cal. June 21, 2016). “Although Rule 21 23(g)(3) does not provide a standard for…