Jones

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MONROE JONES, Case No. 22-cv-07365-WHO (PR)

Plaintiff, 12

ORDER GRANTING

v. 13 DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

14 RAHIMI, Dkt. No. 17 Defendant. 15

16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Monroe Jones alleges in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action that Deputy Rahimi, 19 a correctional deputy with the San Mateo Sheriff’s Department, used excessive force on 20 him and retaliated against him by having him transferred to another facility within the 21 department. Rahimi moves for summary judgment on grounds that Jones did not exhaust 22 his administrative remedies for any claims. The motion is unopposed.1 I will grant 23 summary judgment in Rahimi’s favor because Jones’s allegations are that Rahimi used 24 excessive force and retaliated against him after Rahimi tore up the grievance, and there is 25 1 Jones has not filed an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. He did attempt to 26 file an opposition to another filing. He filed a motion for…