RJ
RJ v. Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 RJ, et al., Case No. 20-cv-02255-EJD (VKD)
9 Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
10 v. TO RETAIN CONFIDENTIALITY
DESIGNATIONS
11 CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 189 12 Defendants.
13 14 Plaintiffs and defendants Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company (“Cigna”) and 15 MultiPlan, Inc. (“MultiPlan”) disagree regarding whether certain portions of three documents 16 should be designated as confidential under the stipulated protective order in this case (Dkt. No. 17 22). Dkt. No. 189. The three documents at issue are: (1) the expert report of defendants’ expert 18 Laurence Baker (“Baker Report”)1; (2) the declaration of Sean Crandell, Senior Vice President of 19 Healthcare Economics for defendant MultiPlan (“Crandell Declaration”)2; and (3) the expert 20 report of plaintiffs’ expert Research & Planning Consultants, LP (“New RPC Report”)3. 21 The parties disagree about the legal…