Plichcik

Plichcik v. Safeco Insurance

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20243:21-cv-05137California2,067 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SUSAN CAROL PLICHCIK, Case No. 3:21-cv-05137-JD

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. 9

10 SAFECO INSURANCE, et al., Defendants. 11

12 13 Pro se plaintiff Susan Carol Plichcik alleges that she lost hundreds of thousands of dollars 14 in personal belongings that were destroyed when her sister’s home was burnt to the ground in the 15 devastating and deadly Tubbs Fire in October 2017. See Dkt. No. 1, Exh. A. Plichcik says she 16 was storing her possessions there. Plichcik sued defendants Safeco Insurance, Safeco Insurance 17 Company of America, Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois (Safeco), and General Insurance 18 Company of America (General), for breach of contract, misrepresentation, emotional distress, 19 Unruh Act, ADA, and Unfair Competition Law claims, all to the effect that the insurers did not 20 pay benefits she claimed under her homeowners policy.1 The complaint looks like it was drafted 21 by an attorney, but Plichcik has acted pro se throughout the litigation. 22 This case has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.